Case study d
Sarah is a bright and thoughtful young woman taking a land based studies course.
She is a residential student at a land based college. She becomes increasingly introverted and withdraws from social groups in the college. It is noted by staff that she spends much of her leisure time alone in her room on her PC.
She has missed college and as her tutor you contact her parents. Her parents tell you that they are concerned about how withdrawn from the family she has become when she comes home at weekends.
They are also worried that she is mixing with a new group of friends some of whom they know have been involved with an extremist animal rights group.
You are then told by fellow students that she is posting comments on her Facebook account about her sympathy for animal rights extremists who have been convicted for attempting to blow up the car of a scientist at a pharmaceutical research centre. She says in one comment that all scientists working on animals deserve to die.
Activity
What would you do in this situation? Make a note of your thoughts in your notepad and then click below to view our suggestions.
Staff would be expected to report Sarah to the designated Safeguarding or Prevent officer.
The Safeguarding officer should assess the situation and if they feel that there is a risk of radicalisation, they should seek advice/guidance from their local Prevent co-ordinator or the local Prevent team.
Individuals or their parents' or guardians if under 18 do need to give consent to be referred to Channel but not for referral to the local Prevent team or co-ordinator.
If someone refuses to go through the Channel process or is not judged to need to go through the Channel process the organisation will need to decide whether additional support may be needed, often with partner organisations.